Friday, September 10, 2021

Why Constructors are not inherited in Java?

Core Java Tutorial and Material, Oracle Java Certification, Oracle Java Guides, Oracle Java Preparation, Oracle Java Career, Oracle Java Learning

Constructor is a block of code that allows you to create an object of class and has same name as class with no explicit return type.

Whenever a class (child class) extends another class (parent class), the sub class inherits state and behavior in the form of variables and methods from its super class but it does not inherit constructor of super class because of following reasons:

◉ Constructors are special and have same name as class name. So if constructors were inherited in child class then child class would contain a parent class constructor which is against the constraint that constructor should have same name as class name. For example see the below code:

class Parent {

public Parent()

{

}

public void print()

{

}

}

public class Child extends Parent {

public Parent()

{

}

public void print()

{

}

public static void main(String[] args)

{

Child c1 = new Child(); // allowed

Child c2 = new Parent(); // not allowed

}

}

If we define Parent class constructor inside Child class it will give compile time error for return type and consider it a method. But for print method it does not give any compile time error and consider it a overriding method.

◉ Now suppose if constructors can be inherited then it will be impossible to achieving encapsulation. Because by using a super class’s constructor we can access/initialize private members of a class.

◉ A constructor cannot be called as a method. It is called when object of the class is created so it does not make sense of creating child class object using parent class constructor notation. i.e. Child c = new Parent();

◉ A parent class constructor is not inherited in child class and this is why super() is added automatically in child class constructor if there is no explicit call to super or this.

Source: geeksforgeeks.org

Related Posts

0 comments:

Post a Comment